The Power of Open Communication in Your Relationship Communication
By
Relationship communication and the power of open communication
A relationship without open communication will inevitably give way to deception. There is no grey area. It is better to hurt another with open communication than to betray with deception. You will find that even the act of open communication prevents deeds that would normally be performed under the veil of dishonesty.
A relationship is a gentle lowering of individuality or Ego. A free flow of ideas, perceptions even insecurities should come to the surface and be discussed. In the ideal environment, no taboo or perceived craziness is outside the limit of open discussion. All taboos are society’s programming anyway- which is far from open at the present time. Even governments and companies have not recognized the power of open communication with their people.
To suddenly start being open after a long period of hiding is far more difficult than being open on a regular basis. But inevitably this line has to be crossed, and accepted. An environment suitable for revealing all is the first stage of open communication. Both parties must be willing to hear anything and refrain from allowing their Ego to jump into the fray; to judge, feel hurt or angry.
Next comes regularity. At first the impulse to be dishonest “in order to protect someone” will be strong. This is the first stage of dishonesty that is justified has being beneficial to the other person. Slowly this nurtures roots of deeper deception. If the root is cut while it is young and even little white lies are absorbed by the light of open communication – no lie can ever grow.
Does this mean one can share all thoughts, all ideas, or beliefs with anyone? It should. For now you’d get locked up or thrown into an institution as a madman. But there will come a time when society’s contract with dishonesty and illusion gives way to a deeper understanding of open communication. In the meantime there can be a selective agreement of open communication between a single couple, a single family, a single company and it’s employees, between a single government and it’s people before finally the whole world accepts the idea as norm.
Everyone may not like the idea at first, preferring to hang on to the perceived power that comes through lying. It is they who will prefer to go to war when the truth has been set free. Granted, there is a fine line between loose lips that sink ships and open communication in the spirit of greater love between two enlightened individuals. Open communication does not mean running the mouth like a loose cannon. It means selectively choosing your words in a way that will bring about greater harmony between yourself and another party. And avoiding the acts that would disrupt that harmony whenever possible. And in the rare cases where a controversial decision must be made in haste and a decision was made in error, it can quickly be discussed, accepted and learned from.
Most great tragedies begin with a small deception that gets cultivated over time. If you can learn to be open even when on the surface it appears that it will not serve you, over time you become the person that can always be depended on for the truth. And because the truth is a power sought from the depths of every Soul- anyone who possesses it will hold a position of great power. Respected, admired and even revered for their sincerity, and openness even in times when the truth is unpopular and their name risks being tarnished- they rise above the primitive contract of society and peer into a new world waiting on the horizon.
James Stinson
http://www.articlesbase.com/advice-articles/the-power-of-open-communication-63195.html
Michael Noone is the publisher of http://www.topcommunicationskills.com an online resource for communications skills training for use with your relationships, family,friends and in your business…
8 Comments
September 9th, 2009 at 7:31 pm
Should Sweden face an international boycott…?
Under new terror laws (ther FRA Law) introduced in this once liberal and egalitarian country the Swedish Government has granted itself the power to open any communication entering it’s border, that is to say any email, letter, text message, telephone call or other communication will be open to scrutiny, regardless of whether it is a private communication or otherwise. Several multinational companies are now considering pulling their business out of Sweden so alarmed are they at the potential breach of their client’s integrity and Belgium is considering taking Sweden to the European Court of Human Rights.
Effectively what this law will do is allow the Swedish Government to intercept any communication that enters it’s borders regardless of whether the recipient is in Sweden or Brazil. If it is routed through Sweden, they can look at it or listen in.
Should Sweden face an international boycott to ensure this law is repealed?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FRA_law
"Loads of countries do this"…Oh, well that’s alright then.
September 10th, 2009 at 12:33 am
Loads of countries already do this
and your source is wikipedia????? hardly reliable….
References :
September 10th, 2009 at 12:35 am
I endorse Swedish sensibilities and will continue to purchace Swedish products except Absolute which portrayed a different American southern border. Skol to the Swedes!
References :
September 10th, 2009 at 12:37 am
that’s sad. but they’re not the only one, and it’s getting worse. Just wait some years and find yourself in one huge police state without any civil rights left. All in the name of their fucking "war against terror", which is all fake anyway.
References :
September 10th, 2009 at 12:39 am
pretty bad source your’re quoting. Wikipedia has horrible reliability.
the US already does this. Any financial record or electronic communication can be read as long as its in the name of ‘national security’ which is mind bogglingly easy to do.
Virtually every country in the world does this. Are we supposed to boycott everyone?
References :
September 10th, 2009 at 12:41 am
NO! I don’t think that they should have a international boycott, they are only looking out for the interest of there County, it’s a Pity that this County don’t do a bit more to look out for our interest, after 9/11 every County have got to be more careful.
References :
September 10th, 2009 at 12:43 am
Well, if this correspondence contains mafia-, trafficking, smuggling or violence-planning material, it SHOULD be acted upon, right? & if not, then surely the Swedish government will still let the email or letter go through to its destination – they can only afford to look at maybe 1% of them at random, but it might do some good in crime fighting, don’t you think?
References :
September 10th, 2009 at 12:45 am
Although the activities of the Swedish government to many would seem alarming the intrusion of governments into all aspects of a citizens life are shocking.
Before being critical of the Swedish stance many years ago reports were brought to the attention of the public of an organisation by the name of "Echelon" which is an Anglo-US body.
Apparently it has the technology to track every email, fax, instant message and telephone call in the world. Its existence was denied by both governments (obviously!!).
Take a look at this for interesting and frightening reading:
http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/11/32296
Perhaps the Swedish have been at least honest with their stance on internet and telecommunications tracking whereas other governments are not!
References :